Middle Way

From Encyclopedia of Buddhism
Jump to: navigation, search
Translations of
Middle Way
English Middle Way
Pali majjhimā paṭipadā
Sanskrit madhyamā-pratipad
Chinese 中道
(Pinyinzhōngdào)
Japanese 中道
(rōmaji: chūdō)
Tibetan དབུ་མའི་ལམ་
(Pron. umaylam)
Thai มัชฌิมา (mátchímaa)
Vietnamese trung đạo

The Middle Way (Sanskrit: madhyamā-pratipad; Pali: majjhimā paipadā) is a fundamental concept in Buddhist thought that refers to avoiding extremes on the path and in one's view of reality.

According to the Buddhist tradition, in the first teaching of the Buddha, he advocated a middle-way path that avoided the two extremes of self-indulgence or self-denial.[1] The Buddha then presented the Noble Eightfold Path as a path that follows the middle way.

In other teachings, the term middle way is used to describe a view that is free from the extremes of eternalism and annihilation.

Middle way between self-indulgence and self-denial

In the life story of the Siddhartha Guatama (the future Buddha), it describes how as a child and young man, Siddhartha's father ensured that his every sensual desire was fulfilled. At this early stage of his life, Siddartha experienced the extreme of self-indulgence. He saw that this way of living could not bring him lasting happiness, and he became dissillusioned with his life as a royal prince. He then left his royal palace and sought knowledge through studying with several forest yogis. After studying meditation techniques with several different teachers, Siddhartha joined a group of five yogis who practiced a form of extreme asceticism. These yogis saw their physical bodies as an impediment to spiritual awakening, and they sought to overcome their attachment to sense pleasures by denying their bodies food and comfort. With these companions, Siddhartha practiced the extreme of self-denial.

Siddhartha practiced with these yogis for many years, until he was near the point of death from starvation. Sensing he was near death, he accepted a bowl of milk rice from a village girl Sujata, daugher of a local householder, who gave it as an offering thinking he was a tree spirit[2]. Upon drinking the nourishing milk, he had the realization that practicing extreme austerities would not lead to a spiritual awakening. Gradually, he developed the insight that the path to awakening must be a middle way between extreme indulgence in sense-pleasures and extreme austerities. It was at this point that he entered into a state of deep meditation that led to his awakening.

Thus, in the first recording teaching that the Buddha gave after his awakening (the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta), the first insight that he revealed was the middle way between the extremes of self-indulgence and self-denial. This concept was the underlying principle for the Noble Eightfold Path, which the Buddha presented as a path to awakening that followed the middle way.

Middle way between eternalism and nihilism

The middle way is also used to refer to the view that rejects the extreme views of eternalism (some things are permanently existing) and annihilationism (nothing exists). This middle way view is closely related to other Buddhist concepts, such as: no-self (anatman) and dependent arising.

No-self (anatman)

The two extreme views with regard to the self (atman) are:

  • there is a permanently existing self or soul that persists after death
  • there is no continuity of the self after death (the self ceases to exist at death)

In the Buddhist view, both of these assertions are not correct. They are said to be extreme views that should be rejected. The middle view asserts that self exists in relation to (or in dependence upon) other causes and conditions. In this view:

  • one can not say that the self is permanent (because the self is constantly changing from one moment to the next, and it only exists in relation to other causes and conditions)
  • one can not say that the self does not exist after death (because there is a continuum)

The term anatman, that is typically translated a no-self is a refutation of the first extreme (a permanent self). This term was used because at the time in which the Buddha taught in India, the belief in a permanent self, or atman was the dominant view.

Dependent origination

Dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) refers to the concept that all phenomena arise in dependence upon multiple causes and conditions. When one of these causes or conditions changes or disappears, the resulting object or phenomena will also change or disappear, as will the objects or phenomena depending on the changing object or phenomena. Thus, there is nothing with an eternal self or atman, only mutually dependent origination and existence.

But the absence of an eternal atman does not mean there is no-thing at all. Early Buddhism adheres to a realistic approach which does not deny existence as such, but denies the existence of eternal and independent substances. This view is the Middle Way between eternalism and annihilationism:

The understanding that sees a 'person' as subsisting in the causal connectedness of dependent arising is often presented in Buddhist thought as 'the middle' (madhyama/majjhima) between the views of 'eternalism' (śaśvata-/sassata-vāda) and 'annihilationism' (uccheda-vāda).[3][lower-alpha 1]

Kaccayanagotta Sutta

The Kaccayanagotta Sutta is an early Buddhist text in which the Buddha describes the middle way between extreme philosophical views.[lower-alpha 2] Contemporary scholar David Kalupahana states:

Two aspects of the Buddha's teachings, the philosophical and the practical, which are mutually dependent, are clearly enunciated in two discourses, the Kaccaayanagotta-sutta and the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta, both of which are held in high esteem by almost all schools of Buddhism in spite of their sectarian rivalries. The Kaccaayanagotta-sutta, quoted by almost all the major schools of Buddhism, deals with the philosophical "middle path", placed against the backdrop of two absolutistic theories in Indian philosophy, namely, permanent existence (atthitaa) propounded in the early Upanishads and nihilistic non-existence (natthitaa) suggested by the Materialists."[4]

Mahayana view

Madhyamaka

Within the Mahayana tradition, Madhyamaka ("Middle Way") school of Nagarjuna refined the meaning of the middle way view between existence and non-existence.

While earlier Buddhist schools of thought accepted the middle way view that the self is neither existent nor non-existent, some schools still believed that there were truly existent small particles (called dharmas) that were the building blocks of the self. This theory was very similar to the early theories of the atom in Western science (the belief that material objects were composed of small indivisible particles).

Nagarjuna's great contribution to Buddhist thought was that he rejected the existence of any type of permanently indivisible objects. He asserted that all phenomena were empty of inherent existence.[5]

Nagarjuna based his philosophy on the early teachings of the Buddha. For example, Nagarjuna's influential Verses on the Middle Way includes a reference to the earlier Kaccayanagotta Sutta:

'Everything exists': That is one extreme.
'Everything doesn't exist': That is a second extreme.
Avoiding these two extremes,
The Tathagata teaches the Dhamma via the middle...."[6]

Nargarjuna clarified the above statement to a more subtle degree than previous Buddhist philosophers. "He used the traditional concept of the ‘middle way’ in a sophisticated dialectical manner, and in so doing pushed the implications of certain of the early teachings to their logical conclusion."[5]

East Asian Buddhist tradition

Tendai

In the Tendai school, the term middle way can also refer to the synthesis of the thesis that all things are "empty", and the antithesis that all things have phenomenal existence.[7]

Chán

In Chan Buddhism the term middle way (aka doctrine of the middle) is also used to describe the realization of being free of the one-sidedness of perspective that takes the extremes of any polarity as objective reality.

In chapter ten of the Platform Sutra, Huineng gives instructions for the teaching of the Dharma. Huineng enumerates 36 basic oppositions of consciousness and explains how the path is free from both extremes:

When people inquire about the doctrines, when they ask of being, respond with nonbeing; when they ask of nonbeing, respond with being. When they ask of the ordinary, respond with the sagely, and when they ask of the sagely, respond with the ordinary. Through the two modes of speaking you will generate the doctrine of the middle. Respond to them one by one, and if there are any other questions, make up [your response] according to this and you will not go wrong. If someone asks you, ‘What is darkness?’, you should answer, ‘Brightness is the cause and darkness is the condition. When brightness disappears there is darkness. Brightness reveals darkness, and darkness reveals brightness.’ Through the modes of coming and going, you will create the doctrine of the middle[8]

See also

Notes

  1. Gethin's endnote (p. 290, n. 22) then references SN 12.17. See Thanissaro 2005)
  2. Other Samyutta Nikaya discourses that reference majjhena dhamma include SN 12.17, SN 12.35, SN 12.48 and SN 22.90. While not explicitly using the term majjhena dhamma, the Mahānidāna Sutta (DN 15), the Pali Canon's longest discourse pertaining to Dependent Origination, includes an extended analysis of "the self" in light of this teaching.


References

  1. Ajahn Sucitto 2010, pp. 21-22.
  2. Pathamasambodhi sutta, summarized in Symbolic and imagery representation of lord Buddha in the museums of Eastern India collection and communication, by Prasopchingchana, Sarunya, see Chapter 1 Lord Buddha: his Life and Events page 63
  3. Gethin (1998),p. 145
  4. David Kalupahana, Mulamadhyamakakarika of Nagarjuna (Motilal Banarsidass: 2006) p. 1
  5. 5.0 5.1 Damian Keown, Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, Kindle Edition, 2000) Kindle Locations 1208-1212
  6. Thanissaro (1997), Translation of Kaccayanagotta Sutta, SN 12.15
  7. Kohn (1991), pp. 143-144.
  8. John R. McRea (translator), Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch (Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research: 2000), 84


Sources

  • Bodhi, Bhikkhu (trans.) (2000). The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-331-1.
  • Bodhi, Bhikkhu (ed., trans.) (2005). In the Buddha's Words: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pāli Canon. Somerville: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-491-1.
  • Buddhaghosa, Bhadantācariya & Bhikkhu Ñāamoli (trans.) (1999). The Path of Purification: Visuddhimagga. Seattle, WA: BPS Pariyatti Editions. ISBN 1-928706-00-2.
  • Dhamma, Rewata (1997). The First Discourse of the Buddha: Turning the wheel of Dhamma. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-104-1.
  • Gethin, Rupert (1998). The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-289223-1.
  • Harvey, Peter (2007). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-31333-3.
  • Kohn, Michael H. (trans.) (1991). The Shambhala Dictionary of Buddhism and Zen. Boston: Shambhala. ISBN 0-87773-520-4.
  • Smith, Huston; Novak, Philip (2009). Buddhism: A Concise Introduction. HarperOne. Kindle Edition.


This article uses material from Middle Way on Wikipedia (view authors). License under CC BY-SA 3.0. Wikipedia logo