Smṛti (P. sati; T. dran pa དྲན་པ་; C. nian; J. nen; K. yŏm 念) is translated as mindfulness, awareness, inspection, recollection, etc. The meaning of smṛti/sati is sometimes glossed as "not forgetting", refering to either not forgetting one's practice instructions, or not forgetting to keep the mind focused on a particular object of meditation. This refers to keeping in mind a particular object of focus, such as the object of meditation (e.g. the breath), the meditation instructions, or one's vows, etc., and not letting the mind wander off in distraction. Bhikkhu Bodhi states: "as a mental factor it signifies presence of mind, attentiveness to the present, rather than the faculty of memory regarding the past."
Smṛti/sati is identified within the Buddhist teachings in the following contexts:
- Right mindfulness: one of the eight factors of the Noble Eightfold Path
- The focus of the meditation practice of Satipatthana (foundations of mindfulness)
- The first of the seven factors of enlightenment
- One of the twenty-five beautiful mental factors within the Abhidhammattha-sangaha of the Pali tradition
- One of the five object-determining mental factors within the Abhidharma-samuccaya of the Sanskrit tradition
- One of the ten omnipresent mental factors within the Abhidharma-kosha of the Sanskrit tradition
- 1 Definitions for the mental factor of smṛti/sati
- 2 Etymology
- 3 Smṛti-based practices
- 4 See also
- 5 Videos
- 6 Notes
- 7 References
- 8 Sources
- 9 External links
Definitions for the mental factor of smṛti/sati
Pali tradition (Sati)
- The word sati derives from a root meaning “to remember,” but as a mental factor it signifies presence of mind, attentiveness to the present, rather than the faculty of memory regarding the past. It has the characteristic of not wobbling, i.e. not floating away from the object. Its function is absence of confusion or non-forgetfulness. It is manifested as guardianship, or as the state of confronting an objective field. Its proximate cause is strong perception (thirasaññā) or the four foundations of mindfulness (see VII, §24).
The Atthasalini sates:
- Mindfulness has "not floating away" as its characteristic, unforgetfulness as its function, guarding, or the state of facing the object, as its manifestation, firm remembrance (sanna) or application in mindfulness as regards the body, etc., as proximate cause. It should be regarded as a door-past from being firmly established in the object, and as a door-keeper from guarding the door of the senses.
Nina van Gorkom explains:
- There are many opportunities for generosity, for morality and for mental development, but we are often forgetful of kusala and we waste such opportunities. When mindfulness arises there is heedfulness of kusala and then the opportunity for kusala which presents, itself is not wasted. There has to be mindfulness with dana, with sila, with samatha and with the development of insight.
Sanskrit tradition (Smṛti)
The Abhidharma-samuccaya states:
- What is inspection? It is not to let what one knows slip away from one's mind. Its function is not to be distracted.
The Khenjuk states:
- Recollection means not forgetting a known object. It's function is to inhibit distraction.
- Recollecting mindfulness (dran-pa) is not merely holding on to any cognized object without losing it as an object of focus. Here, it prevents mental activity from forgetting or losing a constructive object with which it is familiar. It has three characteristics:
- The object must be something constructive with which we are familiar (‘dris-pa)
- The aspect (rnam-pa) must be that it is focused on this object and does not forget or lose it
- The function must be that it prevents mental wandering.
- Thus, mindfulness is equivalent to a type of “mental glue” (‘dzin-cha) that holds on to the object of focus without letting go. Its strength spans the spectrum from weak to strong.
Dawa Chödak Rinpoche stated:
- Drenpa is the seed of memory...our mind is always moving, touching this or that. If we have drenpa then we instantly remember, and we don’t touch... Drenpa is the horse’s bit. If drenpa is not there, the mind is like the wild horse. When you loose your drenpa, in that moment you are getting hesitation. Drenpa helps you to get you on the stage. It is memory. It is recollection. In that moment you are going to do a non-virtue and you remember your vows. That is drenpa. Forgetting is loss of drenpa.
According to Robert Sharf, the meaning of these terms has been the topic of extensive debate and discussion. Smṛti originally meant "to remember", "to recollect", "to bear in mind", as in the Vedic tradition of remembering sacred texts. The term sati also means "to remember". In the Satipațțhāna-sutta the term sati means to remember the dharmas, whereby the true nature of phenomena can be seen. Sharf refers to the Milindapanha, which explained that the arisement of sati calls to mind the wholesome dhammas such as the four establishments of mindfulness, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven awakening-factors, the Noble Eightfold Path, and the attainment of insight. According to Rupert Gethin,
[sati] should be understood as what allows awareness of the full range and extent of dhammas; sati is an awareness of things in relation to things, and hence an awareness of their relative value. Applied to the satipațțhānas, presumably what this means is that sati is what causes the practitioner of yoga to "remember" that any feeling he may experience exists in relation to a whole variety or world of feelings that may be skillful or unskillful, with faults or faultless, relatively inferior or refined, dark or pure."[note 1]
Bhikkhu Bodhi also points to the meaning of "sati" as "memory":
The word derives from a verb, sarati, meaning “to remember,” and occasionally in Pali sati is still explained in a way that connects it with the idea of memory. But when it is used in relation to meditation practice, we have no word in English that precisely captures what it refers to. An early translator cleverly drew upon the word mindfulness, which is not even in my dictionary. This has served its role admirably, but it does not preserve the connection with memory, sometimes needed to make sense of a passage.
John D. Dunne suggests that the translation of sati and smṛti as mindfulness is confusing and that a number of Buddhist scholars have started trying to establish "retention" as the preferred alternative.
Alternate translations for smṛti/sati
The terms sati/smriti have been translated as:
- Attention (Jack Kornfield)
- Concentrated attention (Mahasi Sayadaw)
- Inspection (Herbert Guenther)
- Mindful attention
- Recollecting mindfulness (Alexander Berzin)
- Recollection (Erik Pema Kunsang, Buddhadasa Bhikkhu, John D. Dunne)
- Reflective awareness (Buddhadasa Bhikkhu)
- Remindfulness (James H. Austin)
- Self-recollection (Jack Kornfield)
Distinction from "Bare attention"
Georges Dreyfus has expressed unease with the definition of mindfulness as "bare attention" or "nonelaborative, nonjudgmental, present-centered awareness", stressing that mindfulness in Buddhist context means also "remembering", which indicates that the function of mindfulness also includes the retention of information. Dreyfus concludes his examination by stating:
[T]he identification of mindfulness with bare attention ignores or, at least, underestimates the cognitive implications of mindfulness, its ability to bring together various aspects of experience so as to lead to the clear comprehension of the nature of mental and bodily states. By over-emphasizing the nonjudgmental nature of mindfulness and arguing that our problems stem from conceptuality, contemporary authors are in danger of leading to a one-sided understanding of mindfulness as a form of therapeutically helpful spacious quietness. I think that it is important not to lose sight that mindfulness is not just a therapeutic technique but is a natural capacity that plays a central role in the cognitive process. It is this aspect that seems to be ignored when mindfulness is reduced to a form of nonjudgmental present-centered form of awareness of one’s experiences.
Robert H. Sharf notes that Buddhist practice is aimed at the attainment of "correct view", not just "bare attention":
Mahasi’s technique did not require familiarity with Buddhist doctrine (notably abhidhamma), did not require adherence to strict ethical norms (notably monasticism), and promised astonishingly quick results. This was made possible through interpreting sati as a state of "bare awareness" — the unmediated, non-judgmental perception of things "as they are," uninflected by prior psychological, social, or cultural conditioning. This notion of mindfulness is at variance with premodern Buddhist epistemologies in several respects. Traditional Buddhist practices are oriented more toward acquiring "correct view" and proper ethical discernment, rather than "no view" and a non-judgmental attitude.
Jay Garfield, quoting Shantideva and other sources, stresses that mindfulness is constituted by the union of two functions, calling to mind and vigilantly retaining in mind. He demonstrates that there is a direct connection between the practice of mindfulness and the cultivation of morality – at least in the context of Buddhism from which modern interpretations of mindfulness are stemming.
Smṛti is the focus of specific practices.
Ānāpānasati ("mindfulness of breathing"), is a form of meditation that focuses on feeling the sensations caused by the movements of the breath in the body, as is practiced in the context of mindfulness.
Satipaṭṭhāna ("Foundations of Mindfulness") is a well-known practice that focuses on "mindfulness" of one's body, feelings, mind, and phenomena. This practice is presented in the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta.
Combined with Samprajaña and apramāda
He held that in the proper practice of right mindfulness, sati has to be integrated with sampajañña, clear comprehension, and it is only when these two work together that right mindfulness can fulfill its intended purpose.[note 3]
Ten forms of mindfulness (Ekottara Agama)
- mindfulness of the Buddha
- mindfulness of the Dharma
- mindfulness of the Sangha
- mindfulness of giving
- mindfulness of the heavens
- mindfulness of stopping and resting
- mindfulness of discipline
- mindfulness of breathing
- mindfulness of the body
- mindfulness of death
Search for videos:
- Search YouTube for: Smṛti Buddhism
- Abhidhamma Concept of Attention - Rupert Gethin
- Description: A comprehensive presentation of the Theravada concept of 'Mental States' and the 'Thought Process' given at the Mind and Life seminar organized by His Holiness the Dalai Lama. The discussion becomes interesting with the practical inquiries and contrasting views of the other Abhidharma traditions posed by His Holiness. (Includes detailed discussion of the meaning of sati and smriti.)
- Quotes from Gethin, Rupert M.L. (1992), The Buddhist Path to Awakening: A Study of the Bodhi-Pakkhiȳa Dhammā. BRILL's Indological Library, 7. Leiden and New York: BRILL
- [I]n Buddhist discourse, there are three terms that together map the field of mindfulness [...] [in their Sanskrit variants] smṛti (Pali: sati), samprajaña (Pali: Sampajañña) and apramāda (Pali: appamada).
- According to this correspondence, Ven. Nyanaponika spend his last ten years living with and being cared for by Bodhi. Bodhi refers to Nyanaponika as "my closest kalyāṇamitta in my life as a monk."
- Bhikkhu Bodhi 2000, s.v. Mindfulness (sati).
- van Gorkom 1999, Cetasikas, Mindfulness (sati)
- Yeshe Gyeltsen 1975, s.v. Inspection.
- Mipham Rinpoche 2004, s.v. Recollection.
- StudyBuddhism, Primary Minds and the 51 Mental Factors
- Drenpa (Kunzang Dechen Chodron)
- Sharf 2014, p. 942.
- Sharf, Robert (October 2014). "Mindfulness and Mindlessness in Early Chan" (PDF). Philosophy East and West. 64 (4): 943. ISSN 0031-8221. Retrieved 2015-12-03.
Even so, your Majesty, sati, when it arises, calls to mind dhammas that are skillful and unskillful, with faults and faultless, inferior and refined, dark and pure, together with their counterparts: these are the four establishings of mindfulness, these are the four right endeavors, these are the four bases of success, these are the five faculties, these are the five powers, these are the seven awakening-factors, this is the noble eight-factored path, this is calm, this is insight, this is knowledge, this is freedom. Thus the one who practices yoga resorts to dhammas that should be resorted to and does not resort to dhammas that should not be resorted to; he embraces dhammas that should be embraced and does not embrace dhammas that should not be embraced.
- Sharf 2014, p. 943.
- Interview with Bhikkhu Bodhi: Translator for the Buddha
- Lecture, Stanford University Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education, c 18:03  Archived November 20, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- James H. Austin (2014), Zen-Brain Horizons: Toward a Living Zen, MIT Press, p.83
- "Is Mindfulness Present-Centered and Nonjudgmental? A Discussion of the Cognitive Dimensions of Mindfulness" by Georges Dreyfus
- Geoffrey Samuel, Mindfulness or Mindlessness: Traditional and Modern Buddhist Critiques of "Bare Awareness"
- "Mindfulness and Ethics: Attention, Virtue and Perfection" by Jay Garfield
- "Mindfulness and the Mind," by Subhuti. Madhyamavani Online
- "The Nature of Mindfulness and Its Role in Buddhist Meditation" A Correspondence between B.A. wallace and the Venerable Bikkhu Bodhi, Winter 2006, p.4
- Nan Huaijin. Working Toward Enlightenment: The Cultivation of Practice. York Beach: Samuel Weiser. 1993. pp. 118-119, 138-140.
- Nan Huaijin. Working Toward Enlightenment: The Cultivation of Practice. York Beach: Samuel Weiser. 1993. p. 146.
- Bhikkhu Bodhi, ed. (2000), A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma, Pariyatti Publishing
- Brahm, Ajahn (2005). Mindfulness, Bliss, and Beyond: A Meditator's Handbook. Wisdom Publications. ISBN 978-0-86171-275-5
- Gunaratana, Bhante Henepola (2002). Mindfulness in Plain English. Wisdom Publications. ISBN 978-0-86171-906-8
- Hanh, Thich Nhat (1996). The Miracle of Mindfulness: A Manual on Meditation. Beacon Press.
- Mipham Rinpoche (2004), Gateway to Knowledge, I, translated by Kunsang, Erik Pema, Rangjung Yeshe Publications
- Sharf, Robert (2014), "Mindfulness and Mindlessness in Early Chan", Philosophy Est & West, 64 (4): 933–964, doi:10.1353/pew.2014.0074
- van Gorkom, Nina (1999), Cetasikas, Zolog
- Yeshe Gyeltsen (1975), Mind in Buddhist Psychology: A Translation of Ye-shes rgyal-mtshan's "The Necklace of Clear Understanding", translated by Guenther, Herbert V.; Kawamura, Leslie S., Dharma Publishing
- Mindfulness Research Guide at the American Mindfulness Research Association. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
- Oxford University Mindfulness Research Centre. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
|This article includes content from Sati (Buddhism) on Wikipedia (view authors). License under CC BY-SA 3.0.|